Cam, Sam & the kids with Merkel!

The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, seems to have read our lightweight, self-serving and thoroughly treacherous Prime Minister extremely well!

A report on the Cameron family trip to Germany is in The Spectator linked here.

Her plan appears to be to get him on his own, as far from intelligent or savvy advisors as possible, locked in the bosom of his family about which he is at his happiest when over sentimentalising, and finish off once and for all the humiliation of Britain which has been a thorn in Germany's side since Bismark first set the game-plan for reborn Teutonic  Imperialism and world domination.

Nobody can guess nor ever know what side deals and shady understandings could be reached given the track record of treachery we have already witnessed from this useless prime Minister.

Patriotic members of the Conservative Party have one choice to spare the country from whatever role Merkel and Cameron might agree for it over this weekend, and that is to remove him from leading their party as the first act of next week, fittingly the one during which Margaret Thatcher will be honoured at Westminster.

Heseltine who removed Thatcher from power, returning himself from Germany on the day that act was accomplished, has been pulling Cameron's strings for years. Can the Tory Party really not rise against this puppet successor, who it is surely plain for all to now see, stands for everything that Margaret Thatcher spent her life resisting, opposing and abhorring!

Mali a New Trial for the EU

The Presidency of France is arguably the most powerful elected constitutional post in the Western world. This was strikingly illustrated by President Hollande's brief TV address to the nation yesterday afternoon, when he announced his country's forces were in action in Mali and that his Parliament could discuss it if they wished after the weekend, namely three days ahead on Monday.

Well that once was the case, but what now with the EU and the complications of the ESM Treaty now in force for about three and a half months, summary here, while a more detailed explanation here. The Mali engagement by French forces will inevitably impact the French deficit, debt, credit ratings and thereby its ability to meet its ESM Treaty obligations!

A fascinating dispute between France and Finland has only just arisen which illustrates the coming problems very well, read one report here. Essentially Finland has lost a contract to build a large Caribbean cruise liner in Turku to French competition in St Nazaire, apparently due to Finlan's reluctance to match the level of Government subsidy offered by France. How much more difficult has this dispute become as France's African venture brings ever closer the moment when France, instead of being the second largest contributor to the ESM, instead is forced to call upon it for funds and thus partly reliant on Finland's AAA credit rating for lower interest rates. 

Ironic, is it not that, such lower interest costs and higher credit rating are owed to the sanity of the Finnish Government, the sacrifices of its people given from living within their means and consequent reluctance to dish out grotesque subsidies of wasted taxpayers money for otherwise non-competitive industries?

This blog has repeatedly quoted the nonsense of the contribution percentages written into the ESM Treaty as begging belief, with both Spain and Italy being due to contribute large portions of the funds they seem to be among the most likely to need. Let me try another analogy on the ESM, think of it as a Christmas Club, where with all in full employment they all agree to cough up X% of their wages for a celebratory bash every year. How many need to become unemployed and broke before such a club folds? The ESM, of course, was only formed when several of its founders were already in a state of relying on the formation of such a Club for themselves to avoid bankruptcy!

Let us return to Mali, however, for even more absurdities of the EU will soon appear as a result of France's colonial legacy, the costs of which seem to be about to be partly defrayed by that country's Euro Group partners non-consulted members.

My Great Aunt, Margery Perham, was something of an Africa expert and in 1932 debated the contrast between French direct Colonial Rule with Britain's indirect methods with the then Governor of Chad, Jules Marcel de Coppet, who explained it partly in my Aunt's paraphrase - to the lingering dislike of local government in modern France,'a hangover from strong feudal power and an obstacle to centralization'. In addition, the French experience in Africa had been, from the start, more about military and imperial control than anything else, objectives backed up by the dominant French colonial paradigm to the north, represented by Algeria. (Into Africa, C.Brad Faught, Publisher I.B.Taurusp.80)  

Such is the situation (perhaps I should say potential quagmire) into which the EU, or at least the Euro Group has put itself this morning, complicated even further by the coming into force of the Fiscal Compact a mere eleven days ago.

I will, of course, be returning to these complex issues quite often as the date of PM Cameron's landmark speech on Britain and the EU has now been fixed at 22nd January in the Netherlands, a clear signal that Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg's influence is clearly already heavily at work. The worldly maritime view from Holland and Spain will be now badly needed, rather than the dreadful EU embedded corporatism so far evident in all Clegg's actions.  The very unworldly and frankly almost naive David Cameron is going to struggle to rise to this occasion, especially with Clegg in his team and the likes of Michael Heseltine already loudly interfering from the wings, read here! 

                                                                                        

Thatcher and the Falklands - Heseltine's disgraceful slur

As 2013 dawns most ordinary British people are becoming aware how thoroughly disgusting their politicians are. One exception, in my view, although naturally not free of faults was Margaret Thatcher. Cabinet papers previously secret under the 30 year rule are being released today and hence the morning papers are full of previously unknown information regarding the 1982 Falklands invasion, see here, here and here.

One fact that will be absent is anything lending the remotest credence to the nonsense spouted by the treacherous Michael Heseltine, (who once also allegedly colluded with Continentals to remove Thatcher from power,) as put forth on the BBC Question Time programme on 17th February 2011 as may be seen here: 



In order for the lowest and most venal of politicians to gain power, any with decency or the slightest trace of moral values had first to be removed, this explains the constant denigration of Maggie Thatcher that has followed her since her 1990 resignation and the coming into power of the likes of Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron and Clegg as a presumed result of the takeover of the three main political parties by those with neither principles nor conscience! 

Plebgate - Let's confront the true treachery

In the broad sweep of political conspiracies and historical power changing plots and intrigue, "plebgate" (as the swearing at the gates of Downing Street by the former Tory Chief Whip has come to be called), is but a minor ripple in a very small teacup. Consequently, one presumes as a distraction from the real EU crisis, it has grabbed the attention of Britain's lightweight mainstream media this morning read here and here.

The main concern is the imminent collapse or fragmentation of the EU. The removal of Margaret Thatcher by the scheming of Michael Heseltine and Kenneth Clarke, which allowed the treachery of fellow Conservative, PM Edward Heath, to continue to reach its now approaching climax. This is pushed to the forefront of my mind by Maggie Thatcher's welcome recovery from surgery, read here.

Earlier this week on UKIP Uncovered, I posted an extract of a posting on this blog's forerunner, Ironies, from August 2003, which called for a then ill and failing Edward Heath to be offered a pardon in exchange for the names of his co-conspirators in delivering our nation into the hands of its historical continental enemies for its certain economic destruction and subsequent political domination. This is more briefly again quoted here:

With Heath having recently been flown back from Australia due to ill health, would it not be timely, sensible and a matter of the utmost urgency to now grant him immunity from the possibility of prosecution for his known treasonable actions. In exchange we should demand a detailed explanation of his motives and full details regarding his Continental co-conspirators and their possible next targets in the attempted destruction of our economy, so that we are able, while still just barely surviving as a nation state, to belatedly take some preventative measures to ensure that their schemes, rapidly reaching fruition with the pending Constitution, can at last be thwarted.

posted by Martin at 8/28/2003 06:49:00 AM

That chance to get closer to the truth was then apparently ignored. This week a similar opportunity arises with the news of ex-PM Margaret Thatcher's welcome recovery from her operation. In the archives of her Foundation, given the tremendous foresight we know this formidable lady possesses, there may already be set out full details, as she knew them, of the part played in her downfall by  Heseltine, (in Germany on the evening of the eve of her ousting) Clarke and others.

What may not be known is how Margaret Thatcher, herself, feels as to how those complicit in this probable treason should be dealt with by the nation once EU exit is achieved. Her views on how John Major, whose treachery at Maastricht and benefit from the Heseltine putsch, also makes her opinion on his proper eventual fate of more than a little interest to her countrymen and women!

Those presently in control of the once honourable Conservative Party are the heirs to these dubious dealings. Whether Cameron, Osborne or Mitchell, they are thus beneath our contempt; not least for their own inaction once becoming beneficiaries of the power (for which they plotted, salivated and lusted) was attained. 

Heseltine, High Treason and Hanging

Michael Heseltine is all across the headlines once again this morning, strangely being heralded by both the Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer, symbolising his strong and continuing influence in the high affairs of the state.

High Treason was not repealed in Britain until 1998, when Blair's administration fully aware of the treachery upon which they were intent removed its direst penalties, as may be read in Wikipedia, linked here.

Heseltine when he appeared to set about "adhering to the sovereign's enemies," to secure the removal of the Thatcher Government and facilitate Britain's delivery to foreign powers upon the European Continent, was fully aware of the course upon which he had embarked.

Now that the disastrous results of that treachery and those actions can be clearly seen, (as will be briefly debated in Parliament today), with the nation's sovereignty destroyed, its Parliament on the edge of being completely neutered and hence our democracy condemned to irrelevance, should not some power still valid within our land bring this power-crazed man to trial, whether or not the penalty if found guilty must lamentably be less than the ultimate once available.

Heseltine's henchman, still working to promote foreign interests in every nook and cranny of the state, could then perhaps also be challenged and removed.