Vote OUT of office the sitting parasites!

Only courage today can sow the seeds for renewal! Vote for any but the established parties! Be Bold!

Sleaze Bag Cameron promises to pay-up - Guilt is Clear

The Daily Mail, linked here, has the report on the consequences of Cameron's mortgage switching which to my mind prove him to be amongst the worst of our MPs and fully worthy of the title MP Maggot Cameron, one of the many in Westminster who have been feeding on the corpse of Britain's democracy, do not vote for his Conservative Party tomorrow!

Dirty Tricks at the Conservative Home Blog

Read how they buried this totally destructive interview with David Cameron on the blog Conservative Home as reported on Teetering Tories, from here.

Our corrupt MPs created even more corrupt MEPs

The facts from The Times, linked here, this morning on the massive payouts to retiring MEPs more than fully explains why this blog repeatedly argued that in this depression Thursday's European Elections should have been canceled. For back-up justification read here and here. My blood boils when I hear radio adverts for these elections, paid for by taxpayers, to send corrupt people to feed off the taxpayers in a dual-seated parliament which has no power to legislate nor to hold the real powers in the EU to account. As I posted yesterday nearly all our MPs are corrupt proven by their having conspired in this huge transfer of power. When the people of the EU put an end to the EU Gravy train which they eventually must surely do, let us ensure Westminster has been purged and cleansed so that the occupants have the trust of the electors to re-take the reins of power - that must surely mean that almost no presently sitting member can be re-elected!

UKIP Party Political Broadcast on Immigration

Embedded Video

Blogged with the Flock Browser

GOOD STUFF AND A FANTASTIC OPINION POLL FOR UKIP IN THE TIMES HERE I am taking the weekend off from blogging....... back on Monday!

To vote or not to vote in the EU?

UPI report that less than 50 per cent of electors are likely to vote in next weeks European elections. In France according to a separate Ipsos poll 60 per cent of voters express no interest so I will be reluctant to make my vote thus swelling the turnout figure. Anything which appears to give any form of legitimacy to the disgracefully anti-democratic organisation that is the EU must be absolutely avoided at all costs. The decision of Philippe de Villiers party MPF to become part of the EU supporting Libertas also removes the best chance of placing a vote against the whole concept of the EU. (Voting for the MPF would in any event have broken another of my objectives of refusing to cast a vote for a sitting MEP even though in the case of Phiippe de Villiers he held the distinction of having the worst attendance record of any MEP - a fine achievement!). Were I still in the UK, I believe a vote for UKIP would be better than an abstention although I would keep my options open if other small anti-EU parties such as Jury Team or the English Democrats appeared to be approaching an MEP breakthrough level in my particular region. (Voting for UKIP in the South East should ensure second-placed, fired ex-EU chief accountant Marta Andreasen a seat which will shake the corrupt institution to its very foundations!!!!).

EU Pluralism = Totalitarianism = Leftish Fascism!

We have now witnessed six years of the anti-democratic secret EU elite working to impose their "pluralism" on the diverse individuals who comprise the peoples of Europe. Time enough for those forced to watch in horror to give them their proper name - Fascists. Six years ago today on my blog Ironies, linked here, I concluded my posting discussing what pluralism might mean after noting its appearance in the Preamble to the Constitutional Document arising from the Laeken Convention as follows: As discussed back on 23rd February on this Blogspot Democracy or Pan European Totalitarianism the French tendency towards elitist government structures and their heavy influence in the Convention could lead to a conclusion that none of the straightforward, connotation free, dictionary definitions of pluralism are to be applicable in the Constitution. In politics pluralism can be taken as the view that power in modern LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES is, and should be, held not only by government but by a diversity of autonomous institutions and associsations representing various interests. (Definition from 'The dictionary of important ideas and thinkers' by Chris Rohman). Naturally enough all the so-called worthies who attended the various convention meetings or praesidium sessions would have been aware of that fact, but what of the ordinary citizen with limited research resources? How are we to understand exactly what is supposedly being done in our names. Pluralism as defined above is supposed to provide a harmonious balance between collectivism and individualism but critics, in my view correctly, charge that it is an unrealisable ideal because of the inherent power of the State which of course the new EU will inevitably extend. Interestingly it all leads back to Plato, Popper and more relevantly in this context the elite theory and Robert Michel's iron law of oligarchy whereby control of any political organisation will unavoidably devolve to a small group because of factors such as the need for efficient action, the leader's love of power, and the apathy of the followers. The democratic checks and balances that might serve to prevent such a situation occurring are of course completely absent from the proposed constitutional proposals, thus making pluralism the main objective of the new United States of Europe even more astounding. Six year of posting later those behind this outrage still remain hidden, twenty-seven former democracies with their Parliaments stand on the verge of destruction but there is one last chance for Europeans to register their disgust in the first week of June - do not waste it - total abstention from the European Elections would be the ideal response but is unrealistic, please make sure no sitting MEP in the European Parliament is sent back - that should do the trick!

Vote out the Labour/Conservative/LibDem MEPs

Latest graphic from the Anglo Saxon Chronicles, here.

Interesting posting and comment on English Democrats

Read it from here and make your own choice.

One more day to EU President Klaus

In 14 hours the dangerous waters of the EU French Presidency will be safely behind for we disenfranchised European citizens. What must be the first priority for the Czech Presidency? In my view there is one single overriding priority - the basis for the June EU Parliamentary elections. According to British SE Region MEP Daniel Hannan, reported and linked previously on this blog, the Parliamentary bully boys in combination with the outgoing EU Commission are planning to hold these elections as set out in the non-ratified Lisbon Treaty. ANY EU PARLIAMENT SO ELECTED WOULD BE ILLEGAL - therefore any actions it takes will similarly be non-enforceable while any pretence of the rule of law remains within the EU. All sums spent on the EU Parliament to date are wasted as it remains merely a means to feed back money to the national political parties in payment for the sale of their citizens democratic rights. Continuing to channel yet more billions of Euros to a Parliament without even the pretence of legality by ratified Treaty would be a further intolerable affront to all the people of the EU. If there are to be European elections next June, they must be in accordance with the provisions of the Nice Treaty, quite different from the Lisbon provisions. This is surely the perfect area for President Klaus to signal that the Czech Presidency will bring real change and some return to legality and democracy!