Localism Bill - Progress in putting Local Government under EU Control.
The progress of the Localism Bill may be viewed by clicking this link to Hansard.
Allowing the EU to completely by-pass our Parliament is daily becoming an ever closer reality!
The following bullet points have been researched and prepared by Anne Palmer:
Bullet Points from a Longer Article on the Localism Bill. Just Two pages.
EU’s Localism Bill is absolutely contrary to our Constitution. Our Government is allowing foreigners to make laws that changes forever the governing of our Country and is indeed absolutely contrary to our Common law Constitution.
The Localism Bill divides-permanently-the Nation and Country of the English and England into EU Regions. Scotland is already classed as an EU Region, as is Wales and London. How long will the word ‘ENGLAND’ remain in the Maps?
Firstly Clause 28: Repeal of provisions about petitions to local authorities.
● Clause 28 removes the requirements for local authorities to establish schemes to accept and respond to local petitions. The petition has a long and noble history in this country and is an ancient practice of written request to the sovereign, the Government or Parliament.
● It was recognised in Magna Carta of 1215/1297 the Act of 1406 and William and Mary Bill of Rights of 1689 restated that right in unambiguous terms, ‘…it is the right of the subjects to petition the King, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal’.”
● When a petition is sent to their elected MP, MPs have a duty to present petitions, even where the terms of the petition may be disagreeable to them personally.
● Every Minister of the Queen’s Realm, every MP, every Member of Government swears a true and faithful oath of allegiance to the British Crown. Yet time and time again, Government put the EU needs before the needs of their own Countrymen.
● EU Fines tend to come in thousands, millions and who could stop them coming in billions? All this is also contrary to the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9, “nor excessive fines imposed” and as above all are innocent until proven Guilty. When was the trial? Was the Jury sworn in?
● I ask when some-one (or our UK GOV) is “fined” can this fine be passed on to others that have had absolutely no hand in committing any “crime” what-so-ever? Neither have the people in UK Regions? Yet it is their money used in fines!
● Clause 29 Magna Carta makes clear that "for a trivial offence, a free man shall be fined only in proportion to the degree of his offence, and for a serious offence correspondingly, but not so heavily as to deprive him of his livelihood. In the same way, a merchant shall be spared his merchandise, and a husbandman the implements of his husbandry, if they fall upon the mercy of a Royal Court. None of these fines shall be imposed except by the assessment on oath of reputable men of the neighbourhood". See also Clause 39 and 40. When will our money run out if we keep paying fines?
Bob Spink’s Petition in Parliament, http://www.publications.
Allowing the EU to completely by-pass our Parliament is daily becoming an ever closer reality!
The following bullet points have been researched and prepared by Anne Palmer:
§§§§§
Bullet Points from a Longer Article on the Localism Bill. Just Two pages.
EU’s Localism Bill is absolutely contrary to our Constitution. Our Government is allowing foreigners to make laws that changes forever the governing of our Country and is indeed absolutely contrary to our Common law Constitution.
Firstly Clause 28: Repeal of provisions about petitions to local authorities.
● Clause 28 removes the requirements for local authorities to establish schemes to accept and respond to local petitions. The petition has a long and noble history in this country and is an ancient practice of written request to the sovereign, the Government or Parliament.
● It was recognised in Magna Carta of 1215/1297 the Act of 1406 and William and Mary Bill of Rights of 1689 restated that right in unambiguous terms, ‘…it is the right of the subjects to petition the King, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal’.”
● When a petition is sent to their elected MP, MPs have a duty to present petitions, even where the terms of the petition may be disagreeable to them personally.
● Clause 30 – EU Fines to the UK Government: Power to require local or public authorities to make payments in respect of certain EU financial sanctions. This part creates a power to recover funds from local authorities and other public authorities in England in order to pay all, or part of, a European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) financial sanction imposed for a failure of the United Kingdom to comply with an obligation under the EU treaties.
● Firstly, everyone in this Country is innocent until proven Guilty.
● when individuals are “Fined” by a UK Court, their ability to pay is taken into account, and a trial is of course held-innocent until proven guilty.
● Every Minister of the Queen’s Realm, every MP, every Member of Government swears a true and faithful oath of allegiance to the British Crown. Yet time and time again, Government put the EU needs before the needs of their own Countrymen.
● EU Fines tend to come in thousands, millions and who could stop them coming in billions? All this is also contrary to the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9, “nor excessive fines imposed” and as above all are innocent until proven Guilty. When was the trial? Was the Jury sworn in?
● I ask when some-one (or our UK GOV) is “fined” can this fine be passed on to others that have had absolutely no hand in committing any “crime” what-so-ever? Neither have the people in UK Regions? Yet it is their money used in fines!
● We-the people- pay twice for the same fines, once by our taxes that pay for our MP’s to govern us and again by our taxes to the newly organised Mayors and their entourage. Fines that are imposed upon our Government by the EU, that our Government-the people YOU elected- now expect US/YOU/ME to PAY THEIR FINE. Yet the people will not have committed ANY OFFENCE.
● Clause 29 Magna Carta makes clear that "for a trivial offence, a free man shall be fined only in proportion to the degree of his offence, and for a serious offence correspondingly, but not so heavily as to deprive him of his livelihood. In the same way, a merchant shall be spared his merchandise, and a husbandman the implements of his husbandry, if they fall upon the mercy of a Royal Court. None of these fines shall be imposed except by the assessment on oath of reputable men of the neighbourhood". See also Clause 39 and 40. When will our money run out if we keep paying fines?
● Article 9 Bill of Rights protects Members’ rights of free speech in Parliament, and was used fairly recently re MP’s Finances. Also when we were all banned from holding Fire Arms, this was challenged by Michael James Burke in 1998 and his right to hold a gun and had held a fire-arms certificated at that time for 25 years. He lost his case, so much for Judges that knew their Constitution but did not uphold it-but the more of YOU that fights for it- the message will eventually get through, and now of course ONLY THE BAD GUYS CARRY GUNS.
● In November 2004 a ‘people’s petition’ took place in “today’s” world regarding Iraq which went direct to our House of Commons by MP Bob Spink (Castle Point) (Con): this is available to read through the web-site given at the end. “The Magna Carta, the Act of 1406 and the William and Mary Bill of Rights of 1688 all gave rights to citizens to petition the Government. MPs have a duty to present petitions, even where the terms of the petition may be disagreeable to them personally. The wording (quaint wording) of the petitions has to contain these certain wording for it to be read out in the House of Commons and recorded in Hansard. I hope many, many letters are sent, particularly as we are denied any “say” at all. Please read his letter, and then send one of your own. My letter which I hope helps, is on the last page of the LONG informative letter from my research. Anne 4.10.2011.Bob Spink’s Petition in Parliament, http://www.publications.
§§§§§
Labels: Localism Bill
posted by Martin at 1:50 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home