The Supreme Court - symbol of England's oppression by the EU - Takes Charge!

The Supreme Court, that outfaces the Palace of Westminster across Parliament Square, this week showed its muscles in clearly demonstrating to this downtrodden, once free country, whom, down to the very smallest detail, now controls the nation that once was England, both to its citizens and all those others who nowadays live therein.

Demonstrating the complete helplessness of the House of Commons, the Prime Minister at Question Time yesterday had this to say about a Supreme Court ruling on paedophilia:

The Prime Minister: My hon. Friend speaks for many people in saying how completely offensive it is, once again, to have a ruling by a court that flies in the face of common sense. Requiring serious sexual offenders to sign the register for life, as they now do, has broad support across this House and across the country. I am appalled by the Supreme Court ruling. We will take the minimum possible approach to this ruling and use the opportunity to close some loopholes in the sex offenders register. For instance, we will make it compulsory for sex offenders to report to the authorities before any travel and will not allow them to change their name by deed poll to avoid having their name on the register.

Well may he waffle, for it was he and all those seated around him, who gave birth to this beastliness!

The choosing by this Court of the issue, on which to first confront Parliament, of forgiving child abusers, is interesting to say the least, particularly given the sordid goings on in the capital of Belgium over recent years, read here, which is the effective back yard of the odious organisation of which this abhorrent and unconstitutional court is a creature.

Happily there are a few in England who already recognise the grave dangers to all our freedoms this Supreme Court represents, keep the symbol of the raised garden spade at the forefront of your mind during the coming challenges:

Supreme Court President's speech on end of Judicial Independence in England!

The entire speech, given by Lord Phillips last evening may be read from this link; the section presently causing the most controversy is, I believe the following:

My conclusion is that our present funding arrangements do not satisfactorily guarantee our institutional independence. We are, in reality, dependant each year upon what we can persuade the Ministry of Justice of England and Wales to give us by way of “contribution”. This is not a satisfactory situation for the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. It is already leading to a tendency on the part of the Ministry of Justice to try to gain the Supreme Court as an outlying part of its empire.

This blog repeatedly warned of exactly this end result, particularly in a posting on 17th January 2008, linked here.

BBC fiddles with Listen Again report on Lord Phillips and Ken Clarke

Please read the post below, if pushed for time read only the final paragraph in red with yellow background, it is extremely significant.

The inevitability of the Glorious Revolution.

Bertrand Russell in his "A History of Western Philosophy" writes as follows:

 "James II, unlike his brother, was totally destitute of subtlety and finesse. By his bigoted Catholicism he united against himself the Anglicans and the Nonconformists, in spite of his attempts to conciliate the latter by granting them toleration in defiance of Parliament. Foreign policy also played a part. The Stuarts, in order to avoid the taxation required in war-time, which would have made them dependent upon Parliament, pursued a policy of subservience, first to Spain and then to France. The growing power of France roused the invariable English hostility to the leading Continental State, and the revocation of the Edict of Nates made Protestant feeling bitterly opposed to Louis XIV. In the end almost everybody in England wished to be rid of James. But almost everybody was equally determined to avoid a return to the days of the Civil War and Cromwell's dictatorship. Since there was no constitutional way of getting rid of James, there must be a revolution, but it must be quickly ended, so as to give no opportunity to disruptive forces. The rights of Parliament must be secured once and for all. (Blogger's added emphasis.) The king must go, but monarchy must be preserved; it should be, however, not a monarchy of Divine Right, but one dependent upon legislative sanction, and so upon Parliament. By a combination of aristocracy and big business, all this was achived in a moment, without the necessity of firing a shot. Compromise and moderation had succeeded, after every form of intransigeance had been tried and failed"

Now Parliament, has itself, made the country, and itself, subservient to foreigners. Our Judiciary has been made subservient to the EU fanatical  and treacherous Ken Clarke, who carries the constitutional defying title of  Justice Secretary. (Read a report of last evening's protest against all this of Lord Phillips, the Lord Chief Justice, from here.) The head of the abhorrent Supreme Court is now intended to grovel at Clarke's feet. The lesson from history is clear!

UPDATE 0945 GMT. After an extended delay, the BBC has now provided the 'Listen Again' feature for this morning's interview which followed the 0800 -0810 new bulletin.  The text description of the entire slot has clearly been considerably censored since the first entry, to presumably make it appear that the report is not the bombshell to the EU governance of the UK that it truly seems likely to become. The broadcast, which I assume has not been tampered with is linked here.

Smashing the Supreme Court Windows.

A video of the smashing of the unconstitutional and unlawful Supreme Court windows can now be enjoyed online. Note the huge Christmas Tree these illegitimate parasites have chosen for themselves in this supposed age of austerity!